Books
WHO WOULD WIN?: KILLER WHALE VS. GREAT WHITE SHARK
WHO WOULD WIN?: KOMODO DRAGON VS. KING COBRA
WHO WOULD WIN?: LION VS. TIGER
WHO WOULD WIN?: LOBSTER VS. CRAB
WHO WOULD WIN?: RATTLESNAKE VS. SECRETARY BIRD
WHO WOULD WIN?: RHINO VS. HIPPO
WHO WOULD WIN?: TARANTULA VS. SCORPION
WHO WOULD WIN?: TRICERATOPS VS. SPINOSAURUS
WHO WOULD WIN?: ULTIMATE DINOSAUR RUMBLE
WHO WOULD WIN?: ULTIMATE OCEAN RUMBLE
WHO WOULD WIN?: ULTIMATE REPTILE RUMBLE
WHO WOULD WIN?: WALRUS VS. ELEPHANT SEAL
WHO WOULD WIN?: WHALE VS. GIANT SQUID
WHO WOULD WIN?: WOLVERINE VS. TASMANIAN DEVIL
Who’S Afraid Of A Giant Wheel?
Whoever You Are (Reading Rainbow Books)
Whole Brain Living: The Anatomy of Choice and the Four Characters That Drive Our Life
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.













